{"id":34087,"date":"2022-12-29T09:11:45","date_gmt":"2022-12-29T06:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/demo5.teaser-cube.ru\/2022\/12\/29\/lvpirma-un-pedeja-reize-kad-mes-ierindojam-zvaigznu-karu-filmas\/"},"modified":"2022-12-29T09:11:45","modified_gmt":"2022-12-29T06:11:45","slug":"lvpirma-un-pedeja-reize-kad-mes-ierindojam-zvaigznu-karu-filmas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/2022\/12\/29\/lvpirma-un-pedeja-reize-kad-mes-ierindojam-zvaigznu-karu-filmas\/","title":{"rendered":"Pirm\u0101 - un p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 - reize, kad m\u0113s ierindojam \"Zvaig\u017e\u0146u karu\" filmas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u0160\u012b ir aptuveni 32 300 001. reize - ja uzticamies Google mekl\u0113\u0161anas rezult\u0101tiem -, kad tiek v\u0113rt\u0113tas \"Zvaig\u017e\u0146u karu\" filmas. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka tas ir saraksts. Bet tas ir saraksts, kas ien\u012bst ideju par sarakstiem, t\u0101p\u0113c tas neb\u016bs saraksta form\u0101. Tas ar\u012b ne\u013caus jums ritin\u0101t uz leju, lai redz\u0113tu pilnu rangu. \u0160eit tas ir no lab\u0101k\u0101 l\u012bdz slikt\u0101kajam: Situ atrieb\u012bba (III), Jauna cer\u012bba (IV), Klonu uzbrukums (II), Imp\u0113rija (V), P\u0113d\u0113jie d\u017eedaji (VIII), Fantoma draudze (I), D\u017eedaju atgrie\u0161an\u0101s (VI), Sp\u0113ks mostas (VII), Skywalkeru uzplaukums (IX).\n<\/p>\n<p>M\u016bsu galaktika ir nesak\u0101rtota, un ar katru dienu t\u0101 k\u013c\u016bst arvien nesak\u0101rtot\u0101ka. T\u0101p\u0113c m\u0113s klasific\u0113jam lietas, lai sak\u0101rtotu t\u0101s st\u016br\u012b\u0161us, ko vien varam. Taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 m\u0113s zin\u0101m, ka t\u0101 ir mu\u013c\u0137\u012bba. Vai j\u016bs piekr\u012btat \u0161\u0101dai klasifik\u0101cijai? Protams, ka n\u0113. Pirmk\u0101rt, 9! = 362,880. Pat ja tikai 0,1 procents no tiem ir likum\u012bgi, tas ir daudz pas\u0101kumu. Un argumenti.\n<\/p>\n<p>Iemesls tam - \u0161im sarakstam, kas nav saraksts - ir nesenie se\u0161u epizo\u017eu seri\u0101la \"Obijs V\u0101ns\" pan\u0101kumi, kas izn\u0101k starp ori\u0123in\u0101lo trilo\u0123iju un pirmrindniekiem. Da\u017ei no mums nebija p\u0101rliecin\u0101ti, ka tas b\u016bs veiksm\u012bgs; pirm\u0101s \u010detras epizodes pag\u0101ja neiesp\u0113jami un bie\u017ei vien neveikli. Tad Darts Vaiders piektaj\u0101 epizod\u0113 ar sp\u0113ku izr\u0101va ku\u0123i no gaisa, un l\u012bdz sestajai epizodei neviens negrib\u0113ja, lai tas beidzas. Tostarp ar\u012b divas no t\u0101s zvaigzn\u0113m - Evans Makgregors un Haidens Kristensens, kuri ne tikai izr\u0101d\u012bja interesi atgriezties otraj\u0101 (un, iesp\u0113jams, tre\u0161aj\u0101) sezon\u0101, bet ar\u012b savas publicit\u0101tes t\u016bres laik\u0101 vair\u0101kk\u0101rt izteic\u0101s p\u0101rsteigti un pateic\u012bgi par to, ka cilv\u0113kiem \u0161ie varo\u0146i un filmas, kur\u0101s vi\u0146i par\u0101d\u012bj\u0101s, patika pietiekami, lai Obi-Vans Kenobi visp\u0101r b\u016btu iesp\u0113jams.\n<\/p>\n<p>Varb\u016bt tas bija patiesi, bet - pui\u0161i, kur j\u016bs bij\u0101t? Fakts ir t\u0101ds, ka pirms\u0101kumu filmas, kuras savulaik tik \u013coti norakst\u012bja da\u017ei v\u0101ji dom\u0101jo\u0161i d\u012bvai\u0146i, burtiski visi p\u0101r\u0113jie vienm\u0113r ir uzskat\u012bju\u0161i par lielisk\u0101m. Pat par revolucion\u0101ru. Tas ir galvenais iemesls, k\u0101p\u0113c \u0161is saraksts ien\u012bst sarakstus: Tie ir ritu\u0101li miru\u0161o iem\u016b\u017ein\u0101jumi.\n<\/p>\n<p>Liel\u0101k\u0101 da\u013ca sarakstu sast\u0101d\u012bt\u0101ju galu gal\u0101 ir popkult\u016bras konservat\u012bvie. Vi\u0146i mask\u0113jas k\u0101 \"kvalit\u0101tes\" aizst\u0101vji, kas, k\u0101 pa\u0161i apgalvo, \"ciena\" v\u0113sturi, un uzskata, ka risk\u0113t noz\u012bm\u0113 uztur\u0113t ortodoksiju. T\u0101tad: 2001. gads ir lab\u0101k\u0101 zin\u0101tnisk\u0101s fantastikas filma. Tolk\u012bns ir lab\u0101kais fant\u0101zijas rakstnieks. Un, 32 miljono reizi, \"Epizode V: Imp\u0113rija atvelk triecienu\" ir lab\u0101kais \"Zvaig\u017e\u0146u kar\u0161\".\n<\/p>\n<p>Vai t\u0101 ir? \u013boti iesp\u0113jams, ar t\u0101s atkl\u0101jumiem un amput\u0101cij\u0101m. Bet ko dar\u012bt, ja j\u016bs vienk\u0101r\u0161i sak\u0101t, ka t\u0101 nav? Nekas tik slikts nenotiek, un, iesp\u0113jams, notiek kaut kas \u013coti labs. P\u0113k\u0161\u0146i j\u016bs esat satriekts no savas pa\u0161apmierin\u0101t\u012bbas un p\u0101rliec\u012bbas - pat ja j\u016bs sagaid\u0101t, ka beig\u0101s atgriez\u012bsieties pie t\u0101s, v\u0113l p\u0101rliecin\u0101t\u0101ks (bet tagad vismaz maz\u0101k pa\u0161apmierin\u0101ts).\n<\/p>\n<p>Viena lieta, kas nekad nav bijusi \u012bsti j\u0113ga par Imp\u0113riju, bija \u0161\u0101da: Yoda, t\u012brs gudr\u012bbas, melo. Vi\u0146\u0161 saka, ka, ja L\u016bks nepaliks purv\u0101 un nepabeigs d\u017eedaju apm\u0101c\u012bbu, vi\u0146\u0161 b\u016bs lemts k\u013c\u016bt par \"\u013caunuma a\u0123entu\".  \" To ignor\u0113jot, L\u016bka aizlido gl\u0101bt savus draugus. Ikviens var piekrist, ka tas ir piln\u012bgs \u013caunuma pretstats - par kura a\u0123entu L\u016bks nekad, pat ne no att\u0101luma, nek\u013c\u016bst. Tad k\u0101p\u0113c Joda to teica? Lai vi\u0146u nobied\u0113tu? Un manipul\u0113t ar vi\u0146u? Tas nav \u013coti l\u012bdz\u012bgi Jedi.\n<\/p>\n<p>Vai ar\u012b t\u0101 ir? D\u017eord\u017ea L\u016bkasa \"pirms\u0101kumu trilo\u0123ija\" ir daudz vair\u0101k nek\u0101 tikai st\u0101sts par Vaidera izcel\u0161anos. T\u0101 ar\u012b p\u0101rskat\u012bja d\u017eedaju mantojumu un l\u012bdz ar to ar\u012b pa\u0161as fran\u0161\u012bzes mantojumu. Slaven\u0101 D\u017eedaju padome izr\u0101d\u012bj\u0101s nevis k\u0101ds gudr\u012bbas, c\u0113luma un paties\u012bbas bastions, bet gan nepiln\u012bga, pat korump\u0113ta: piln\u012bgi sp\u0113j\u012bga manipul\u0113t un kr\u0101pties. V\u0101rdu sakot, kolos\u0101la neveiksme. Yoda sagr\u0101va Dooku, t\u0101pat k\u0101 Obi-Vans sagr\u0101va Anakinu un l\u012bdz ar vi\u0146u ar\u012b galaktiku.\n<\/p>\n<p>T\u0101 bija pasaules veido\u0161ana - pasaules p\u0101rb\u016bve - vislab\u0101kaj\u0101 veid\u0101. Atgrie\u017eoties atpaka\u013c un atk\u0101rtoti noskatoties ori\u0123in\u0101l\u0101s filmas, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 priek\u0161v\u0113stures filmas, var\u0113ja dzi\u013c\u0101k nov\u0113rt\u0113t L\u016bkas gai\u0161umu, vi\u0146a labest\u012bbu. Tagad bija skaidrs, ka vien\u012bgais iemesls, k\u0101p\u0113c vi\u0146\u0161 b\u016btu k\u013cuvis par \u013caunuma a\u0123entu, bija tas, ja vi\u0146\u0161 b\u016btu paklaus\u012bjis Jodu un neb\u016btu gl\u0101bis savus draugus. Kaut k\u0101d\u0101 l\u012bmen\u012b L\u016bka bija saskat\u012bjis d\u017eedaju neveiksmi, vi\u0146u piev\u0113r\u0161anos dogmatismam un augstpr\u0101t\u012bgai viszin\u0101m\u012bbai, un cent\u0101s \u0161o modeli lauzt. T\u0101p\u0113c \u0161aj\u0101 sarakst\u0101 \"Klonu uzbrukums\" atrodas tuvu virsotnei, bet \"Situ atrieb\u012bba\" - pa\u0161\u0101 aug\u0161gal\u0101. Ja fran\u0161\u012bzes jaunais st\u0101sts padzi\u013cina vai papla\u0161ina, nevis ierobe\u017eo vai grauj j\u016bsu priek\u0161statu un prieku par ori\u0123in\u0101lu, tas ir v\u0113rt\u012bgs - un to var ticami uzskat\u012bt par lab\u0101ku.\n<\/p>\n<p>J. J. Abramss to nesaprata. Kad vi\u0146\u0161 dev\u0101s veidot savu ieguld\u012bjumu Skywalker Saga - epizodes VII - IX, produc\u0113jot visas tr\u012bs, re\u017eis\u0113jot pirmo un tre\u0161o - vi\u0146\u0161 iedvesmu mekl\u0113ja nevis prequels, k\u0101 vi\u0146am vajadz\u0113ja. Vi\u0146\u0161 skat\u012bj\u0101s uz ori\u0123in\u0101lfilm\u0101m.\n<\/p>\n<p>Rezult\u0101t\u0101, k\u0101 da\u017ei saka, tika rad\u012bti \"velt\u012bjumi\" L\u016bkasam, m\u012b\u013cas rekonstrukcijas, kas iepaz\u012bstin\u0101ja jauno paaudzi ar \"Zvaig\u017e\u0146u karu\" arhetipisko st\u0101st\u012bjumu. T\u0101 ir mu\u013c\u0137\u012bba. Abramsa filmas bija, atkl\u0101ti sakot, pla\u0123i\u0101ti, kas bija pirm\u0101 l\u012bme\u0146a pla\u0123i\u0101ts, kop\u0113\u0161ana un iel\u012bm\u0113\u0161ana, ko v\u0113l apkaunojo\u0161\u0101ku padar\u012bja m\u0101jiens, ka sievie\u0161u lomas atveido\u0161ana Daisy Ridley Rey lom\u0101 bija viss, kas bija vajadz\u012bgs, lai padar\u012btu \u0161o darbu le\u0123it\u012bmu. T\u0101p\u0113c vi\u0146a film\u0101m jebkur\u0101 reiting\u0101 un noteikti ar\u012b \u0161aj\u0101 reiting\u0101 ir j\u0101atrodas tikai p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 viet\u0101. Varo\u0146i un si\u017eeta punkti bija tik \u013coti atdarin\u0101mi uz to ori\u0123in\u0101l\u0101s st\u0101sta versijas kol\u0113\u0123iem, un Abramsa izt\u0113les tr\u016bkums bija tik piln\u012bgs, ka trilo\u0123ija l\u012bdz pat \u0161ai dienai draud izn\u012bcin\u0101t visas fran\u0161\u012bzes mantojumu.\n<\/p>\n<p>Tas atkal ir iemesls, k\u0101p\u0113c \u0161is saraksts ien\u012bst sarakstus. Jo, lai gan Abramss ir vainojams Reijas ce\u013cojuma uz d\u017eedaju valst\u012bbu visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101 bezj\u0113dz\u012bb\u0101 - un vi\u0146\u0161 patie\u0161\u0101m, patie\u0161\u0101m ir -, saraksti, jo \u012bpa\u0161i tie, kas kalpo tikai normu atk\u0101rto\u0161anai, ir tikpat, un varb\u016bt pat v\u0113l vair\u0101k, atbild\u012bgi. \u0160\u0101di saraksti ir slinki, klibo\u0161i, bez sp\u012bduma, bez sp\u012bduma, bez tr\u016bkuma. Nep\u0101rtraukti atbalstot vec\u0101 slavu, tie pa\u0161i uzspie\u017e savu izvair\u012b\u0161anos no riska, saind\u0113jot auditoriju ar konservat\u012bvismu, kas ir pamat\u012bg\u0101 pretrun\u0101 ar emancip\u0113jo\u0161o st\u0101st\u012b\u0161anas m\u0101kslu. Rezult\u0101t\u0101 fandomi, t\u0101lu no radik\u0101lu p\u0101rmai\u0146u atbalst\u012b\u0161anas, pieprasa uztic\u012bbu, lojalit\u0101ti trad\u012bcij\u0101m.\n<\/p>\n<p>Gadu gait\u0101 da\u017ei \"Zvaig\u017e\u0146u karu\" fandoma sl\u0101\u0146i ir izr\u0101d\u012bju\u0161ies tie\u0161i t\u0101di - gal\u0113ji atpaliku\u0161i un l\u012bdz ar to nev\u0113las p\u0101rmai\u0146as. Citiem v\u0101rdiem sakot, ne gudri, ne c\u0113li vai patiesi, bet nepiln\u012bgi, pat korump\u0113ti - cilv\u0113ku neveiksmes. Cik liela ir \u0161\u012b sodalit\u0101te, nekad nav bijis piln\u012bgi skaidrs. Skaidrs ir viens: Vi\u0146i ir tur, un vi\u0146i m\u016bs bremz\u0113.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u013boti iesp\u0113jams, ka daudzi no jums ir tie\u0161i tie, kam ir dom\u0101ts \u0161\u0101ds raksts. Pajaut\u0101jiet sev, k\u0101 reiz Joda jaut\u0101ja L\u016bkam: K\u0101p\u0113c tu esi \u0161eit? Jo, ja tas ir, lai str\u012bd\u0113tos un izr\u0101d\u012btos, un policija un naids - un kas gan cits tas b\u016btu?  - j\u016bs jau esat \u013caunuma a\u0123ents. Mekl\u0113t \"Zvaig\u017e\u0146u karu\" filmu reitingus, las\u012bt sarakstu p\u0113c saraksta, sarakstu p\u0113c saraksta, lai attaisnotu savu aps\u0113st\u012bbu ar mirsto\u0161u fran\u0161\u012bzi un nostal\u0123iju p\u0113c t\u0101s: bezgal\u012bg\u0101s stundas, ko esat pavad\u012bju\u0161i, p\u0101rsprie\u017eot t\u0101s bezj\u0113dz\u012bg\u0101s deta\u013cas. Ja vien tev b\u016btu draugi, pie kuriem aizb\u0113gt. Ja vien jums b\u016btu re\u0101li cilv\u0113ki, kurus gl\u0101bt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0160\u012b ir aptuveni 32 300 001. reize - ja uzticamies Google mekl\u0113\u0161anas rezult\u0101tiem -, kad tiek v\u0113rt\u0113tas \"Zvaig\u017e\u0146u karu\" filmas. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka tas ir saraksts. Bet tas ir saraksts, kas ien\u012bst ideju par sarakstiem, t\u0101p\u0113c tas neb\u016bs saraksta form\u0101. Tas ar\u012b ne\u013caus jums ritin\u0101t uz leju, lai redz\u0113tu pilnu rangu. \u0160eit tas ir no [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":34102,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-angry-nerd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34087"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34087\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34102"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movieworld.blog\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}